Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: GAINS, INC., Appellant. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed July 10, 2001, which assessed Gains, Inc. for additional unemployment insurance contributions.
Gains, Inc., a company involved in brokering business sales, challenges a determination of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board which determined that analysts and brokers who facilitated these sales were employees rather than independent contractors. “[O]ur review is limited to ascertaining whether the Board's decision is supported by substantial evidence, and if so its decision must be affirmed even though there might be evidence to support a contrary conclusion” (Matter of Francis [W. Sanitation Servs.-Sweeney], 246 A.D.2d 751, 752, 668 N.Y.S.2d 55, lvs. dismissed 92 N.Y.2d 886, 678 N.Y.S.2d 587, 700 N.E.2d 1223, 93 N.Y.2d 833, 687 N.Y.S.2d 623, 710 N.E.2d 269). It is well settled that the existence of an employer-employee relationship is determined by whether “the employer exercises either control over the results produced or, more importantly, over the means used to achieve the results” (Matter of Braunstein [Dinaire Corp.-Commissioner of Labor], 250 A.D.2d 899, 899, 672 N.Y.S.2d 522). Here, notwithstanding a contract provision that brokers and analysts were independent contractors, the contract signed by the brokers nevertheless reserved to Gains the right to specify the procedures, prices, terms and conditions and forms to be used. Brokers were prohibited from hiring assistants without prior written consent from Gains and were forbidden to work for a competitor for one year following the termination of the contract. Given the broad power vested in Gains as per the terms of the contract, we find substantial evidence to support the Board's decision that Gains had sufficient authority to direct the manner in which the brokers worked to establish an employer-employee relationship (see Matter of Economy Off. Maintenance [Commissioner of Labor], 292 A.D.2d 651, 739 N.Y.S.2d 750; Matter of Cohen [L.T.A. Realty Corp.-Ross], 55 A.D.2d 788, 390 N.Y.S.2d 229).
ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: October 24, 2002
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)