Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: the Claim of Jeffery M. PRESTON, Appellant. ARG Trucking Company, Inc., Respondent. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed August 29, 2001, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause.
Substantial evidence supports the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board finding that claimant voluntarily left his employment without good cause. Claimant resigned from his employment as a driver for a transportation company after the employer refused to pay him based upon the actual miles driven to a location in Massachusetts. It is well settled that dissatisfaction with one's work assignment or wages does not constitute good cause for leaving employment (see Matter of Dragoi [Commissioner of Labor], 288 A.D.2d 685, 732 N.Y.S.2d 685; Matter of Preus [Commissioner of Labor], 252 A.D.2d 715, 675 N.Y.S.2d 670). Here, the record establishes that, regardless of the route taken, the employer paid its drivers at a mileage rate determined by the “commercial book miles” rather than the actual miles driven. Although claimant maintains that the employer gave him a set of directions to the location in Massachusetts and agreed to pay him based upon the actual miles driven on this particular run, the employer's testimony to the contrary created a credibility issue for the Board to resolve (see Matter of Mondiello [Commissioner of Labor], 268 A.D.2d 762, 702 N.Y.S.2d 170). To the extent that claimant maintains that certain documents are missing from the record, a review of the hearing transcript establishes that such documents were never admitted into evidence. In any event, the contents thereof were testified to at the hearing.
ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: October 31, 2002
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)