Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: the Claim of Jeaneen A. BISHOP, Appellant. New York City Human Resources Administration, Respondent. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed December 20, 1999, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because her employment was terminated due to misconduct.
Claimant challenges a determination finding that she was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits after her employment as an institutional aide for the Human Services Department of the City of New York was terminated. Following an arbitration hearing pursuant to claimant's collective bargaining agreement, it was determined that she had filed a false police report concerning an alleged physical altercation with her supervisor, that claimant used abusive language toward her supervisor and that she lied under oath in connection with the alleged altercation. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board appropriately gave collateral estoppel effect to the factual findings of the arbitrator as the record establishes that claimant was given a full and fair opportunity to litigate the issue of her misconduct at the arbitration hearing (see, Matter of Rolle [Nassau County Civil Serv. Commn.-Commissioner of Labor], 258 A.D.2d 871, 687 N.Y.S.2d 181). Given claimant's dishonest conduct, substantial evidence supports the Board's finding that she engaged in disqualifying misconduct (see, Matter of Shuaib [Commissioner of Labor], 268 A.D.2d 744, 702 N.Y.S.2d 168). Claimant's remaining contentions have been reviewed and found to be without merit.
ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: April 19, 2001
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)