Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Nancy BONO, etc., et al., appellant, v. HUNTER MOUNTAIN SKI BOWL, INC., et al., respondents.
In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for wrongful death, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Sangiorgio, J.), entered February 5, 1999, which granted the defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.
While skiing down an expert slope at premises operated by the defendant Hunter Mountain Ski Bowl, Inc., the decedent and his companion encountered icy conditions in the center portion of the trail. They decided to avoid the ice by skiing on a fifteen-foot wide portion along the right tree line, which they judged to have better conditions. Unfortunately, the decedent then hit an ice patch, fell, struck a tree, and suffered fatal injuries. Upon stipulation, the action was dismissed insofar as asserted against the defendant Hunter Water Supply Corp. The remaining defendants subsequently moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint based on the doctrine of assumption of risk, and the Supreme Court granted the motion. We affirm.
The deposition testimony of the decedent's widow, the plaintiff, and of the decedent's skiing companion, established that the decedent was an experienced skier who had skied on the trail in the past. Accordingly, the decedent, as a voluntary participant in the sport of skiing, assumed the very risks that he encountered before his fatal accident (see, General Obligations Law § 18-101; Morgan v. State of New York, 90 N.Y.2d 471, 662 N.Y.S.2d 421, 685 N.E.2d 202; Braun v. Davos Resort, 241 A.D.2d 533, 661 N.Y.S.2d 643). The conclusory affidavit of the plaintiff's expert, submitted in opposition to the defendants' motion, was insufficient to raise an issue of fact as to whether the defendants unreasonably increased the risks to which the decedent was exposed (see, Osorio v. Deer Run Assocs., 231 A.D.2d 504, 647 N.Y.S.2d 93).
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: February 22, 2000
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)