Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: COMPS, INC., appellant, v. TOWN OF HUNTINGTON, et al., respondents.
In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondents, dated March 26, 1997, which denied, without a hearing, the petitioner's request under the Freedom of Information Law (Public Officers Law art 6) for the inventory data for all parcels contained on the assessment roll of the Town of Huntington, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Kitson, J.), dated October 28, 1998, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
The Supreme Court properly determined that the requested inventory data constituted a record within the meaning of the Freedom of Information Law (hereinafter FOIL) (see, Public Officers Law § 86[4]; Matter of Encore Coll. Bookstores v. Auxiliary Serv. Corp. of State Univ. of N.Y. at Farmingdale, 87 N.Y.2d 410, 416, 639 N.Y.S.2d 990, 663 N.E.2d 302; Matter of Russo v. Nassau County Community Coll., 81 N.Y.2d 690, 698-699, 603 N.Y.S.2d 294, 623 N.E.2d 15).
The Supreme Court also properly determined that the privacy exemption under FOIL was applicable because the petitioner intended to use the information for commercial purposes (see, Public Officers Law § 89[2][b] [iii] ). The redaction of names and addresses from the inventory data would not protect privacy interests as the tax map numbers contained in that data would, nonetheless, enable the petitioner to identify the names and addresses of property owners through a comparison of the tax map numbers to the assessment roll (see, Matter of Siegel, Fenchel & Peddy v. Central Pine Barrens Joint Planning & Policy Commn., 251 A.D.2d 670, 676 N.Y.S.2d 191). Because the respondents have not utilized the inventory data for the purposes of any assessment or reassessment, they are not under any statutory duty to publish the inventory data at this time (see, e.g., RPTL § 500[1]; § § 501, 502; General Municipal Law § 51; see also, Matter of Empire Realty Corp. v. New York State Div. of Lottery, 230 A.D.2d 270, 273, 657 N.Y.S.2d 504).
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: February 14, 2000
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)