Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: ORANGE AND ROCKLAND UTILITIES, respondent, v. CITY OF MIDDLETOWN ASSESSOR, et al., appellants.
In a proceeding pursuant to Real Property Tax Law article 7 to review certain real property tax assessments, the City of Middletown Assessor, the City of Middletown Board of Assessment Review, and the City of Middletown appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Palella, J.), dated March 15, 1999, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the first cause of action in the petition.
ORDERED that the order is modified, on the law, by adding thereto a provision that, upon searching the record, summary judgment is granted to the petitioner on the first cause of action; as so modified, the order is affirmed, with costs to the petitioner.
Contrary to the appellants' contention, the electric wires and gas pipes which traverse over or under the premises of the petitioner's customers do not constitute taxable real property within the meaning of Real Property Tax Law § 102(12). The courts have consistently held, for almost a century, that the type of utility lines and meters at the center of this dispute are not taxable as real estate (see, Matter of New York Telephone Co., 290 N.Y. 537, 49 N.E.2d 999; People ex rel. New York Edison Co. v. Feitner, 45 Misc. 12, 90 N.Y.S. 826, affd. 99 App.Div. 274, 90 N.Y.S. 904, affd. 181 N.Y. 549, 74 N.E. 1124).
Moreover, to the extent that there is any ambiguity in the statutory definition of taxable real property, it must construed most strongly in favor of the taxpayer and against the taxing authority (see, Matter of Manhattan Cable TV Servs. v. Freyberg, 49 N.Y.2d 868, 869, 427 N.Y.S.2d 933, 405 N.E.2d 178; Matter of KIAC Partners, v. Cerullo, 260 A.D.2d 381, 384, 687 N.Y.S.2d 692).
In light of this determination, we search the record and grant summary judgment to the petitioner on the first cause of action annulling the assessment of the subject property.
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: February 14, 2000
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)