Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: the Claim of Nehemiah ROLLE, Appellant. Nassau County Civil Service Commission, Respondent. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed November 25, 1997, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct.
After claimant's employment as a custodial worker was terminated, he was initially found to be eligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits by the local unemployment office and an Administrative Law Judge (hereinafter ALJ). The employer appealed this decision to the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board. In the interim, however, an arbitration hearing was held which resulted in a finding that claimant engaged in misconduct warranting his discharge. Accordingly, the Board rescinded the ALJ's decision and remitted the matter for a new hearing in light of the arbitrator's decision. The ALJ ultimately gave collateral estoppel effect to the arbitrator's factual findings and found that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits, a decision upheld by the Board.
We affirm. Substantial evidence supports the Board's finding that claimant engaged in disqualifying misconduct. The factual findings of the arbitrator were properly given collateral estoppel effect in view of the fact that claimant was given a full and fair opportunity to litigate the misconduct issue at the arbitration hearing (see, Matter of Harewood [Commissioner of Labor], 253 A.D.2d 934, 677 N.Y.S.2d 811). Contrary to claimant's argument, his rights were not violated due to the fact that an earlier decision by an ALJ in his favor was rendered prior to the arbitrator's decision since “the final factfinder in the administrative process is the Board, not the ALJ” (Matter of Brauner [Patchogue Nursing Ctr.-Hartnett], 162 A.D.2d 838, 840-841, 557 N.Y.S.2d 741, lv. dismissed 76 N.Y.2d 1018, 565 N.Y.S.2d 767, 566 N.E.2d 1172; see, Matter of Edie [New York City Tr. Auth.-Commissioner of Labor], 253 A.D.2d 952, 953, 677 N.Y.S.2d 821, 822).
ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: February 25, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)