Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Robert DAVIS, Petitioner, v. Brian S. FISCHER, as Commissioner of Correctional Services, Respondent.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
Petitioner, a prison inmate, was charged in a misbehavior report with violating the prison disciplinary rules that prohibit conspiring to introduce drugs into the facility and soliciting others to smuggle drugs into the facility. Following a tier III disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found guilty of both charges. That determination was administratively affirmed with a modified penalty and this CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.
We confirm. The misbehavior report, hearing testimony from the correction officer who authored the report, taped telephone conversations and an incoming letter to petitioner comprise substantial evidence supporting the determination of guilt (see Matter of Werner v. Philips, 20 A.D.3d 711, 711-712, 798 N.Y.S.2d 241 [2005] ). Given that the foregoing evidence, without more, was legally sufficient to uphold the determination, the Hearing Officer's improper reliance upon an outgoing letter from petitioner which was not authorized by a mail watch was harmless (see Matter of Carter v. Goord, 266 A.D.2d 623, 624, 697 N.Y.S.2d 726 [1999]; Matter of Fletcher v. Selsky, 199 A.D.2d 865, 866, 606 N.Y.S.2d 396 [1993], lv. denied 83 N.Y.2d 753, 612 N.Y.S.2d 108, 634 N.E.2d 604 [1994] ). To the extent not specifically addressed herein, petitioner's remaining contentions have been examined and are unavailing.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: May 22, 2008
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)