Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Ricky BUTLER, Petitioner, v. Donald SELSKY, as Director of Special Housing and Inmate Disciplinary Programs, Respondent.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
During a search of petitioner's prison cell, a correction officer discovered a broken razor with a missing blade, which blade had been removed and hidden inside some paperwork. As a consequence, petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with altering state property, possessing an altered item and destroying state property. At the conclusion of a tier III disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found guilty of all three charges. That determination was affirmed upon administrative appeal, prompting petitioner to commence this CPLR article 78 proceeding.
We confirm. The misbehavior report, together with the testimony of the correction officer who performed the cell search and authored the report, provide substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt (see Matter of Davis v. Goord, 34 A.D.3d 1027, 1027, 824 N.Y.S.2d 460 [2006] ). Petitioner's exculpatory statements, including his claim that he accidentally broke the razor by stepping on it, presented a credibility issue for resolution by the Hearing Officer (see Matter of Vigliotti v. Selsky, 45 A.D.3d 946, 946-947, 844 N.Y.S.2d 502 [2007] ). Regarding deficiencies in the hearing transcript, they are not so significant as to preclude meaningful review by this Court (see Matter of Lewis v. Goord, 43 A.D.3d 1223, 1224, 842 N.Y.S.2d 105 [2007] ). Finally, petitioner's contention that the Hearing Officer failed to assess his mental health status is unpreserved for our review given petitioner's failure to raise it at the disciplinary hearing (see Matter of Spirles v. Goord, 308 A.D.2d 610, 611, 764 N.Y.S.2d 218 [2003] ).
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: March 27, 2008
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)