Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: TAMAINE WILLIAM B. (Anonymous), a/k/a Tamaine B. (Anonymous), a/k/a Tamaine McK. (Anonymous), a/k/a Tamaine W. (Anonymous); Little Flower Children's Services, respondent; Lekitia W. (Anonymous), a/k/a Lekitia B. (Anonymous), a/k/a Lekitia McK. (Anonymous), appellant. (Proceeding No. 1). In the Matter of Tarrel William B. (Anonymous), a/k/a Tarrel B. (Anonymous), a/k/a Tarrell B. (Anonymous); Little Flower Children's Services, respondent; Lekitia W. (Anonymous), a/k/a Lekitia B. (Anonymous), a/k/a Lekitia McK. (Anonymous), appellant. (Proceeding No. 2).
In two related proceedings pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b to terminate the mother's parental rights on the ground of mental illness, the mother appeals from two orders of fact-finding and disposition (one as to each child) of the Family Court, Kings County (Elkins, J.), both dated September 27, 2005, which, after a fact-finding hearing, inter alia, terminated her parental rights and transferred custody and guardianship of the children to the Commissioner of Social Services of the City of New York and Little Flower Children's Services for purposes of adoption.
ORDERED that the orders are affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The petitioner agency established by clear and convincing evidence that the mother, presently and for the foreseeable future, will be unable, by reason of mental illness, to provide proper and adequate care for her children (see Social Services Law § 384-b[4][c]; Matter of Michael W., 15 A.D.3d 670, 670-671, 790 N.Y.S.2d 232). After interviewing the mother and reviewing her medical records and case history, the court-appointed clinical psychologist testified that the mother suffers from “psychotic disorder NOS,” i.e., a psychotic disorder “not otherwise specified.” The psychologist opined that, if returned to the mother, the children would be at risk of being neglected in the present and foreseeable future, because of the mother's mental illness, her lack of insight about it, and her refusal to seek treatment. This evidence supported the Family Court's determination (see Matter of Dederia S.C., 26 A.D.3d 375, 809 N.Y.S.2d 189; Matter of Karyn Katrina D., 19 A.D.3d 592, 797 N.Y.S.2d 536; Matter of Julia P., 8 A.D.3d 389, 777 N.Y.S.2d 729).
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: March 20, 2007
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)