Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Terrell CUFFEE, etc., et al., Petitioners-Respondents, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, et al., Respondents, New York City Housing Authority, Appellant.
In a proceeding to pursuant to General Municipal Law § 50-e(5) for leave to serve a late notice of claim, the New York City Housing Authority appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Jackson, J.), dated October 6, 1994, as granted that branch of the petitioners' application which was for leave to serve a late notice of claim upon it.
ORDERED that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, as a matter of discretion, with costs, and that branch of the petitioners' application which was for leave to serve a late notice of claim upon the New York City Housing Authority is denied.
The Supreme Court improvidently exercised its discretion in granting the petitioners' application to serve a late notice of claim against the New York City Housing Authority (hereinafter the Housing Authority). The petitioners failed to submit sufficient evidence adequately explaining their delay in serving the Housing Authority with a notice of claim. Further, it is clear that the delay was not attributable to the injured petitioner's infancy (see, Matter of Turner v. New York City Hous. Auth., 243 A.D.2d 636, 663 N.Y.S.2d 254; Matter of Fallon v. County of Westchester, 184 A.D.2d 510, 584 N.Y.S.2d 322). Similarly, there is no support in the record for the petitioners' conclusory and speculative assertion that the Housing Authority acquired actual knowledge of the essential facts constituting the claim within 90 days following its accrual or a reasonable time thereafter (see, Pecchio v. National Safety Envtl., 211 A.D.2d 773, 621 N.Y.S.2d 665; Matter of McAllister v. County of Nassau, 202 A.D.2d 670, 609 N.Y.S.2d 294; see also, Matter of Finneran v. City of New York, 228 A.D.2d 596, 597, 644 N.Y.S.2d 537). There is no evidence in the record that connects the actions of the Housing Authority Police Officers to the underlying incident or the petitioners' allegations of assault, false arrest, and false imprisonment (see, Matter of Fallon v. County of Westchester, supra, at 511, 584 N.Y.S.2d 322).
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: November 16, 1998
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)