Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Ingeborg WIECK, Respondent, v. Sidney HALPERN, Appellant.
In an action to compel the defendant to remove all fencing on his property, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (DiNoto, J.), dated February 26, 1998, which denied his motion pursuant to CPLR 5015 to vacate an order of the same court, entered November 3, 1997, upon his default in answering the complaint or appearing in the action.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The plaintiff commenced an action to compel the defendant to remove all fencing on his property. The plaintiff was directed to personally serve an order to show cause upon the defendant, along with a copy of his previously filed summons and complaint, on or before August 21, 1997. The defendant neither appeared on the return date of the motion nor timely interposed an answer to the complaint. On November 3, 1997, the court granted the motion upon the defendant's default.
The defendant moved to vacate the default arguing, inter alia, that he was not served with the motion papers in accordance with the terms of the order to show cause. However, the process server's affidavits constituted prima facie evidence of proper service on August 21, 1997, pursuant to CPLR 308(1), and the defendant's allegations were insufficient to refute the contents of these affidavits (see, Green Point Savings Bank v. Clark, 253 A.D.2d 410, 676 N.Y.S.2d 874; Remington Invest. v. Seiden, 240 A.D.2d 647, 658 N.Y.S.2d 696; Sando Realty Corp. v. Aris, 209 A.D.2d 682, 619 N.Y.S.2d 140).
The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit.
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: November 16, 1998
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)