IN RE: ATTORNEYS IN VIOLATION OF JUDICIARY LAW § 468-a. (2026)

DECISION AND ORDER

ON MOTION

THIRD JUDICIAL

Calendar Date:  March 23, 2026

Monica A. Duffy, Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, Albany (Alison M. Coan of counsel), for Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department.

Jacob Hardie Wilson, Toronto, Canada, respondent pro se.Motion by respondent for an order reinstating him to the practice of law following his suspension by September 2022 order of this Court (Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468–a, 208 AD3d 1421, 1444 [3d Dept 2022];  see Rules for Atty Disciplinary Matters [22 NYCRR] § 1240.16;  Rules of App.Div., 3d Dept [22 NYCRR] § 806.16).Upon reading respondent ‘s notice of motion and affidavit with exhibits sworn to January 8, 2026,

the March 16, 2026 responsive correspondence from the Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department,

having determined, by clear and convincing evidence, that (1) respondent has complied with the order of suspension and the rules of this Court, (2) respondent has the requisite character

fitness to practice law, and (3) it would be in the public interest to reinstate respondent to the practice of law (see Rules for Atty Disciplinary Matters [22 NYCRR] § 1240.16[a] ), we grant his application.  Notwithstanding his satisfaction of the substantive requirements for reinstatement, we direct respondent to (1) demonstrate his completion of six continuing legal education credits in the areas of Skills

/or Law Practice Management (see Rules of App.Div., All Depts [22 NYCRR] § 1500.2[d], [e] ) that specifically relate to the practice of law in New York (see Rules of App.Div., 3d Dept [22 NYCRR] § 806.16[c][5][i] );

(2) provide proof of his compliance with this condition to both this Court

the Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department within 60 days of this Court's order.  Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that respondent ‘s motion for reinstatement is granted; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law, effective immediately, subject to the conditions set forth in this decision.

Garry, P.J., Pritzker, Ceresia, Mackey

Ryba, JJ., concur.