Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The People, etc., respondent, v. Reggie Frank, appellant.
Submitted—February 18, 2026
DECISION & ORDER
M/
Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a resentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Raymond L. Rodriguez, J.), imposed December 13, 2024, after remittitur from this Court for resentencing (see People v. Frank, 232 AD3d 621), on the ground that the resentence was excessive.
ORDERED that the resentence is affirmed.
The resentence imposed was not excessive (see People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80).
BARROS, J.P., CHAMBERS, DOWLING, LANDICINO and HOM, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Darrell M. Joseph
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 2025–00084 (Ind.No. 1657 /18)
Decided: April 01, 2026
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)