The People, etc., respondent, v. Reggie Frank, appellant. (2026)

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

The People, etc., respondent, v. Reggie Frank, appellant.

2025–00084 (Ind.No. 1657 /18)

Decided: April 01, 2026

BETSY BARROS, J.P. CHERYL E. CHAMBERS DEBORAH A. DOWLING CARL J. LANDICINO PHILLIP HOM, JJ.

Patricia Pazner, New York, N.Y. (David P. Greenberg of counsel), for appellant. Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Morgan J. Dennehy of counsel; Robert Ho on the memorandum), for respondent.

Submitted—February 18, 2026

DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a resentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Raymond L. Rodriguez, J.), imposed December 13, 2024, after remittitur from this Court for resentencing (see People v. Frank, 232 AD3d 621), on the ground that the resentence was excessive.

ORDERED that the resentence is affirmed.

The resentence imposed was not excessive (see People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80).

BARROS, J.P., CHAMBERS, DOWLING, LANDICINO and HOM, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Darrell M. Joseph

Clerk of the Court

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network