Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Elsa Tobin, appellant, v. County of Nassau, respondent.
Argued—September 2, 2025
DECISION & ORDER
C/
In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the County of Nassau, determining that the petitioner was required to pay 10% of the cost of her health insurance premiums after reaching age 55, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Gary M. Carlton, J.), entered February 7, 2024. The judgment denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
The petitioner, who had been employed by the Nassau County District Attorney's Office from 1994 to 2004, became re-employed by the Nassau County District Attorney's Office in 2022. The County subsequently informed the petitioner that it had determined that she would be required to continue to pay 10% of the cost of her health insurance premiums after reaching age 55. The petitioner commenced this proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review this determination, contending that the County should be required to pay the full cost of her health insurance premiums upon her reaching the age of 55.
Contrary to the petitioner's contention, the County's determination that the petitioner was required to continue to pay 10% of the cost of her health insurance premiums pursuant to Nassau County Ordinance 4–2002 after reaching age 55 was not arbitrary, capricious, or contrary to law (see CPLR 7803[3]; Matter of Brookdale Physicians' Dialysis Assoc., Inc. v Department of Fin. of the City of N.Y., 41 NY3d 608, 616; Matter of Madison County Indus. Dev. Agency v State of N.Y. Auths. Budget Off., 33 NY3d 131, 135). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.
The parties' remaining contentions are either without merit or not properly before this Court.
LASALLE, P.J., CHAMBERS, FORD and MCCORMACK, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Darrell M. Joseph
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 2024–04875 (Index No. 616655 /22)
Decided: March 18, 2026
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)