Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: the CLAIM OF Maria E. CRUZ, Appellant. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed August 29, 2024, which dismissed claimant's appeal from a decision of the Administrative Law Judge as untimely.
By decision dated November 16, 2023, an Administrative Law Judge (hereinafter ALJ) ruled that claimant was ineligible to receive benefits from November 30, 2020 through June 7, 2021, charged her with recoverable overpayments of benefits and imposed a civil penalty. Claimant submitted a hearing request on July 16, 2024 in which she, among other things, sought to appeal from the ALJ's decision. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board responded on July 29, 2024 and advised claimant that, although her appeal was untimely, the Board would review her “appeal request to determine if good cause had been shown for the delay.” The Board ultimately determined that it had not and dismissed the appeal as untimely. Claimant appeals.
We affirm. “Labor Law § 621(1) provides that an appeal to the Board from a decision of an ALJ must be made within 20 days of the mailing or personal delivery of the decision, and this time requirement is strictly construed” (Matter of Cromwell [Commissioner of Labor], 204 A.D.3d 1207, 1208, 164 N.Y.S.3d 539 [3d Dept 2022] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; accord Matter of Chin [Commissioner of Labor], 214 A.D.3d 1286, 1287, 184 N.Y.S.3d 637 [3d Dept 2023] ). As the Board noted, claimant did not take an appeal from the ALJ's decision within that time frame and offered no explanation for her failure to do so. Thus, “the merits of the ALJ's decision are not properly before this Court, and the Board's decision dismissing claimant's appeal as untimely will not be disturbed” (Matter of Chin [Commissioner of Labor], 214 A.D.3d at 1287, 184 N.Y.S.3d 637; see Matter of Tracy [Commissioner of Labor], 224 A.D.3d 1058, 1059, 205 N.Y.S.3d 550 [3d Dept 2024] ).
ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
Garry, P.J., Reynolds Fitzgerald, Ceresia, Powers and Corcoran, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: CV-25-0351
Decided: March 12, 2026
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)