Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Dylan K. VELLA, Appellant.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Saratoga County (James Murphy III, J.), rendered January 11, 2022, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crimes of murder in the second degree, assault in the first degree (two counts), assault in the second degree and sexual abuse in the first degree.
In satisfaction of a 23–count indictment, defendant pleaded guilty to murder in the second degree, two counts of assault in the first degree, assault in the second degree and sexual abuse in the first degree and agreed to waive his right to appeal. In accordance with the plea agreement, County Court sentenced defendant to a prison term of 20 years to life for his conviction of second-degree murder and lesser concurrent prison terms, followed by periods of postrelease supervision, on the remaining convictions. Defendant appeals.1
The sole issue raised by defendant on appeal is that the agreed-upon sentence is harsh and severe, and he asks that it be reduced in the interest of justice. Defendant's request for such review, however, is foreclosed by his unchallenged appeal waiver (see People v. Lopez, 6 N.Y.3d 248, 255–256, 811 N.Y.S.2d 623, 844 N.E.2d 1145 [2006]; People v. Andrews, 244 A.D.3d 1324, 1324, 243 N.Y.S.3d 855 [3d Dept 2025]; People v. Hardy, 243 A.D.3d 968, 968, 242 N.Y.S.3d 431 [3d Dept 2025] ).
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
FOOTNOTES
1. Although the People assert that the appeal should be dismissed pursuant to CPL 450.10(2), which “purports to disallow an appeal as of right to the Appellate Division where the sole issue is the claimed excessiveness of the agreed-upon sentence imposed by a judgment rendered upon a guilty plea, that provision was found to be an unconstitutional limitation on the jurisdiction of the Appellate Division” (People v. Manson, 205 A.D.3d 1150, 1151, 165 N.Y.S.3d 922 [3d Dept 2022]; see People v. Pollenz, 67 N.Y.2d 264, 267–269, 502 N.Y.S.2d 417, 493 N.E.2d 541 [1986] ).
Fisher, J.
Reynolds Fitzgerald, J.P., Ceresia, Powers and Mackey, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 113479
Decided: March 12, 2026
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)