Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: the Claim of Kathleen H. JOHNSON, Appellant, v. COUNTY OF CLINTON, Respondent. Workers' Compensation Board, Respondent.
Appeal from a decision of the Workers' Compensation Board, filed August 4, 2006, which ruled that the death of claimant's decedent did not arise out of his employment and denied her claim for workers' compensation death benefits.
Claimant filed for workers' compensation death benefits after her husband died at work. A Workers' Compensation Law Judge denied the claim, finding that the presumption of compensability had been rebutted and decedent's death was not causally related to his employment. The Workers' Compensation Board affirmed the denial of benefits, prompting this appeal.
Initially, we note that the presumption of compensability is inapplicable here, as decedent's death was witnessed by fellow employees and explained by autopsy (see Matter of Crapo v. City of Buffalo, 24 A.D.3d 838, 839, 805 N.Y.S.2d 180 [2005] ). We further are of the opinion that there is substantial evidence supporting the Board's determination based upon the testimony of the workers' compensation carrier's medical expert. While claimant's expert rendered a contrary opinion as to decedent's cause of death, we need note only that resolution of such conflicting opinions rests with the Board, whose determination we accord due deference (see e.g. Matter of Dean v. Bill Rapp Pontiac, Inc., 30 A.D.3d 806, 807, 816 N.Y.S.2d 597 [2006] ).
ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
CREW III, J.P.
PETERS, SPAIN, CARPINELLO and MUGGLIN, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 502590
Decided: December 20, 2007
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)