Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, etc., respondent, v. SUFFOLK COUNTY PUBLIC ADMINISTRATOR, etc., et al., defendants; 260LA, LLC, etc., nonparty-appellant.
DECISION & ORDER
In an action to foreclose a mortgage, nonparty 260LA, LLC, appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (S. Betsy Heckman Torres, J.), dated December 10, 2024. The order denied that nonparty's motion pursuant to CPLR 5015(a) to vacate, inter alia, an order and judgment of foreclosure and sale (one paper) of the same court entered April 5, 2024, and, upon vacatur, to dismiss the complaint or, in the alternative, for leave to file a late answer.
ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, with costs.
“ ‘CPLR 5526 requires that a record on appeal contain the papers and exhibits upon which the order appealed from was founded. It is the obligation of the appellant to assemble a proper record on appeal’ ” (McWhinney v. Rockland Cider Works, LLC, 233 A.D.3d 668, 669, 221 N.Y.S.3d 232, quoting Bruzzese v. Bruzzese, 203 A.D.3d 1007, 1010, 165 N.Y.S.3d 115; see Klein v. Richs Towing, 213 A.D.3d 920, 920–921, 184 N.Y.S.3d 156). “ ‘Generally speaking, [a]n appellant's record on appeal must contain all of the relevant papers before the Supreme Court’ ” (McWhinney v. Rockland Cider Works, LLC, 233 A.D.3d at 669, 221 N.Y.S.3d 232, quoting Babayev v. Kreitzman, 168 A.D.3d 655, 655, 90 N.Y.S.3d 288; see CPLR 5526).
Here, the record is inadequate, as it does not include, inter alia, a copy of the order of reference, the order and judgment of foreclosure and sale, or the affidavit of service of the subject motion, upon all of which the appellant relies on this appeal. Since these omissions “ ‘inhibit [this] [C]ourt's ability to render an informed decision on the merits of the appeal,’ ” dismissal of the appeal is appropriate (McWhinney v. Rockland Cider Works, LLC, 233 A.D.3d at 669, 221 N.Y.S.3d 232, quoting Ravasio v. La Pata, 216 A.D.3d 686, 687, 188 N.Y.S.3d 165; see Klein v. Richs Towing, 213 A.D.3d at 921, 184 N.Y.S.3d 156).
DILLON, J.P., WOOTEN, WARHIT and GOLIA, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 2024-13499
Decided: January 21, 2026
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)