Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Matthew R. BONSER, Appellant.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Broome County (Kevin Dooley, J.), rendered December 17, 2021, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crimes of attempted murder in the second degree, burglary in the first degree and assault in the second degree.
In satisfaction of a 16–count indictment, defendant pleaded guilty to attempted murder in the second degree, burglary in the first degree and assault in the second degree and agreed to waive his right to appeal. Consistent with the terms of the plea agreement, County Court sentenced defendant to concurrent prison terms of 20 years, to be followed by five years of postrelease supervision, on the attempted murder and burglary convictions and to a lesser concurrent prison term on the assault conviction. Defendant appeals.
We are unpersuaded by defendant's contention that the waiver of his right to appeal is invalid. Defendant was aware that waiving his right to appeal was a condition of the plea agreement, and County Court explained that such appeal waiver was separate and distinct from the rights forfeited by his guilty plea and that he nevertheless retained certain appellate rights, which defendant acknowledged he understood. Defendant also executed a written appeal waiver and, although it contained some overbroad language, defendant confirmed that he had reviewed it with counsel and understood the rights he was waiving and those he retained. Upon our review of the oral colloquy and written waiver, we are satisfied that defendant's appeal waiver was knowing, voluntary and intelligent (see People v. Sheehan, ––– AD3d ––––, ––––, 2025 N.Y. Slip Op 05277, *2 [3d Dept 2025]; People v. Gonzalez, 234 AD3d 1186, 1186–1187 [3d Dept 2025]; People v. Morse, 230 AD3d 1471, 1472 [3d Dept 2024]). Given the valid appeal waiver, defendant's challenge to the perceived severity of the sentence imposed is foreclosed (see People v. Murauskas, 240 AD3d 1007, 1009 [3d Dept 2025], lv denied 43 NY3d 1057 [2025]; People v. Rowe, 239 AD3d 1202, 1202 [3d Dept 2025], lv denied 44 NY3d 984 [2025]).
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
Garry, P.J., Clark, Reynolds Fitzgerald, Mackey and Corcoran, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: CR-23-2006
Decided: December 11, 2025
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)