Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Ming-Liang Philip CHUNG, et al., Respondents, v. EXPRESS TOURS, INC., et al., Appellants.
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Held, J.), dated September 1, 1999, which denied their motion for partial summary judgment dismissing the causes of action asserted by the plaintiffs Jiang Yi Wang and Sandy Liu, and to change the venue of the action from Kings County to Richmond County.
ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, the causes of action asserted by the plaintiffs Jiang Yi Wang and Sandy Liu are dismissed, and the action on behalf of the remaining plaintiffs is severed; and it is further,
ORDERED that the Clerk of the Supreme Court, Kings County, is directed to deliver to the Clerk of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, all papers filed in the action and certified copies of all minutes and entries (see, CPLR 511 [d] ).
The defendants made a prima facie showing that the causes of action asserted by the plaintiff Jiang Yi Wang (hereinafter Wang) and the derivative cause of action asserted by the plaintiff Sandy Liu (hereinafter Liu) are barred by the Workers' Compensation Law. It was therefore incumbent upon the plaintiffs to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether Wang was working in his capacity as a tour guide for the defendant Express Tours, Inc. (hereinafter Express), and whether Express had obtained Workers' Compensation insurance coverage for him. The affirmation submitted by the plaintiffs' attorney in opposition to the motion was devoid of any evidentiary value and failed to raise a triable issue of fact (see, Zuckerman v. City of New York, 49 N.Y.2d 557, 427 N.Y.S.2d 595, 404 N.E.2d 718).
Since the Supreme Court should have granted partial summary judgment dismissing the causes of action asserted by Wang and Liu, the venue of the action should be transferred to Richmond County, the county of residence of the only remaining plaintiff who resides in the State of New York (see, Tamburro v. International Bus. Machs. Corp., 234 A.D.2d 535, 651 N.Y.S.2d 918).
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: July 24, 2000
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)