Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Gilberto Lugo ORTIZ, etc., et al., respondents, v. JIMTION FOOD CORP., d/b/a C-Town, et al., appellants.
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendants appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Price, J.), dated September 21, 1999, as denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
ORDERED that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed.
The plaintiff Gilberto Lugo Ortiz (hereinafter Ortiz) slipped and fell on accumulated snow and ice in the back lot of the defendant C-Town's supermarket. That store was leased from the defendant Hartford Leasing Corp. To get up, Ortiz reached out and grabbed a branch. When he let go, the branch struck him in the eye, causing injury.
Liability may not be imposed upon a party who “ ‘merely furnished the condition or occasion for the occurrence of the event’ but was not one of its causes” (Shatz v. Kutshers Country Club, 247 A.D.2d 375, 668 N.Y.S.2d 643; Poggiali v. Town of Babylon, 219 A.D.2d 626, 631 N.Y.S.2d 415; Williams v. Envelope Tr. Corp., 186 A.D.2d 797, 589 N.Y.S.2d 345). Here, the snow and ice furnished the occasion for the plaintiff Gilberto Ortiz's fall, but was not the proximate cause of his injury.
Moreover, the action of the plaintiff Gilberto Ortiz in grabbing the branch to pull himself back up and upon releasing the branch, being struck in the eye, was not a normal or foreseeable consequence of any situation created by the defendants (see, Derdiarian v. Felix Contr. Corp., 51 N.Y.2d 308, 315, 434 N.Y.S.2d 166, 414 N.E.2d 666).
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: July 24, 2000
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)