Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Brian GOODFELLOW, Appellant.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of St. Lawrence County (Gregory Storie, J.), rendered January 4, 2023, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of attempted criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree.
In satisfaction of a 12–count indictment, defendant pleaded guilty to attempted criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, with the understanding that he would be sentenced, as a second felony offender, to a prison term of 31/212 years, to be followed by five years of postrelease supervision. The plea agreement also required that defendant waive the right to appeal. County Court imposed the agreed-upon sentence, and defendant appeals.
We affirm. Defendant's contention that his waiver of the right to appeal is invalid is unpersuasive. County Court advised defendant that the appeal waiver was a condition of his plea agreement, discussed the nature of the appellate process, explained that the appeal waiver was separate and distinct from the trial-related rights that are forfeited by a guilty plea and expressly identified various appellate rights that survive the waiver, and defendant affirmed his understanding thereof. Additionally, defendant executed a written waiver that similarly delineated certain appellate issues that survive the waiver, and the court confirmed that defendant had read the waiver, discussed it with counsel and had no questions (see People v. Berry, 236 A.D.3d 1199, 1200, 229 N.Y.S.3d 692 [3d Dept. 2025]; People v. Cali, 229 A.D.3d 940, 941, 215 N.Y.S.3d 222 [3d Dept. 2024]). Accordingly, we find that defendant knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily waived the right to appeal (see People v. Patterson, 233 A.D.3d 1204, 1205, 221 N.Y.S.3d 794 [3d Dept. 2024]; People v. Mathous, 228 A.D.3d 1140, 1140, 211 N.Y.S.3d 634 [3d Dept. 2024]). Given defendant's valid appeal waiver, he is precluded from challenging the sentence as unduly harsh or severe (see People v. Williams, 235 A.D.3d 1066, 1067, 226 N.Y.S.3d 691 [3d Dept. 2025]; People v. Thomas–Jandrew, 228 A.D.3d 1067, 1068, 211 N.Y.S.3d 622 [3d Dept. 2024]).
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
Calendar Date: October 3, 2025
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: CR-23-1177
Decided: November 13, 2025
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)