Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Susan C. CARR, Petitioner-Respondent, v. JONBIL, INC., et al., Respondents-Respondents; John Carr, Jr., Intervenor-Appellant.
In a turnover proceeding pursuant to CPLR 5225(b) and 5227, the intervenor John Carr, Jr., appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Cohalan, J.), entered January 16, 1997, and an order of the same court, entered March 18, 1997, which, inter alia, granted Susan Carr's petition and directed Jonbil, Inc., as the administrator of the Jonbil, Inc., Merged Profit Sharing Plan, and South Trust Bank of Alabama, N.A., as the trustee thereof, to pay Susan Carr $37,368.73, plus investment earnings on such amount accruing on or after February 5, 1997, less fees and expenses, from his account with the Jonbil, Inc., Merged Profit Sharing Plan.
ORDERED that the judgment and the order are reversed, with one bill of costs, on the law and the facts, and the proceeding is dismissed.
Contrary to the trial court's determination, no qualified domestic relations order was entered in the present proceeding (see, Internal Revenue Code [26 U.S.C] § 414[p]; 29 U.S.C. § 1056[d][3] ). Therefore, pursuant to CPLR 5205(c), the funds in the appellant's account with the Jonbil, Inc., Merged Profit Sharing Plan (hereinafter the plan) are exempt from satisfying the petitioner's judgment (see, Dallin v. Dallin, 225 A.D.2d 728, 640 N.Y.S.2d 196). Moreover, a pension plan may not be assigned or alienated unless a qualified domestic relations order is issued (see, 29 USC § 1056[d] [1], [3]; Winter v. Boskin, 181 A.D.2d 1000, 582 N.Y.S.2d 573).
Furthermore, the evidence presented failed to establish that Susan Carr and the appellant are joint beneficiaries of the appellant's account. Rather, the evidence established that the appellant is a participant in the plan and Susan Carr's consent was needed merely to approve early lump sum payment in order to protect her rights as a potential surviving spouse.
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: December 08, 1997
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)