Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: CHRISTOPHER C., Appellant.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Appeal from that part of an order of the Supreme Court (James Walsh, J.), entered December 10, 2024 in Saratoga County, which, in a proceeding pursuant to Civil Rights Law § 60, denied petitioner's request to seal court records.
Petitioner, a transgender individual, commenced this Civil Rights Law article 6 proceeding to change her name and to seal the court record of this proceeding. In connection with the sealing request, petitioner affirmed that she was concerned about “retaliation” against her by her employer as well as general violence against transgender individuals. Supreme Court granted the petition to change her name but denied her sealing request because the court's list of “public interest concerns” outweighed the threat to petitioner's safety posed by an open record of the proceeding.1 Petitioner appeals, and, for the reasons stated in (Matter of Kieran B., ––– A.D.3d ––––, ––––, ––– N.Y.S.3d ––––, 2025 WL 3028374 [3d Dept. 2025] [decided herewith]), we modify the appealed-from order to grant petitioner's sealing request pursuant to Civil Rights Law § 64–a.
ORDERED that the order is modified, on the law, without costs, by reversing so much thereof as denied petitioner's request to seal court records; application granted to that extent; and, as so modified, affirmed.
FOOTNOTES
1. That list “include[ed], but [was] not limited to, the due process of any judgment creditors, the effects upon powers of attorney, any unknown implications with Article 81 proceedings, the due process in foreclosure actions, deed recordation and title insurance, mortgages recorded with the County Clerk's office, probate matters, interference with single scope background investigations for security clearance purposes or firearm authorizations, and lastly, any adverse impact upon future genealogical research.”
Aarons, J.
Garry, P.J., Fisher, McShan and Mackey, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: CV-25-0027
Decided: October 30, 2025
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)