Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
NEW JERUSALEM (WEST) et al., Appellants, v. NEW YORK STATE ELECTRIC & GAS et al., Respondents.
Appeals (1) from an order of the County Court of Chemung County (Hayden, J.) entered February 18, 2004, which granted a motion by defendant New York State Electric & Gas to dismiss the complaint, and (2) from an order of said court, entered February 21, 2004, which, inter alia, assessed counsel fees against plaintiffs.
Plaintiffs in this action include the purportedly “sovereign, free and independent nation” of New Jerusalem located at premises “formerly” known as 1130 Lake Street in the City of Elmira, Chemung County, and are a self-described church without a congregation. The aforesaid premises has been occupied, at least in part, as the “private ․ residential parsonage” of the unnamed plaintiff minister, Candy Stephenson. This occupancy, despite municipal code violations, was the subject of an earlier appeal to this Court (Matter of Church of Chosen v. City of Elmira, 18 A.D.3d 978, 795 N.Y.S.2d 141 [2005] ). Here, plaintiffs have sued, among others, defendants New York State Electric & Gas, Chemung County District Attorney, City of Elmira and numerous City officials claiming, among other conduct, that they had engaged in “acts of treason” by furthering “[g]lobal [g]overnment policies.” According to plaintiffs, the means allegedly employed by defendants to deprive America of its sovereignty are world-wide mind control and “dream machines.” Plaintiffs now appeal from orders dismissing the action as frivolous and awarding defendants counsel fees.
Finding no error in either order appealed from, we now affirm. It is patent that plaintiffs' claims are completely devoid of legal merit. Further, County Court properly exercised its discretion in awarding reasonable counsel fees to defendants in an effort “to deter conduct that wastes judicial resources and inhibits the proper administration of the court system” (Matter of Gordon v. Marrone, 202 A.D.2d 104, 111, 616 N.Y.S.2d 98 [1994], lv. denied 84 N.Y.2d 813, 623 N.Y.S.2d 181, 647 N.E.2d 453 [1995] ).
ORDERED that the orders are affirmed, with one bill of costs.
CARPINELLO, J.
SPAIN, J.P., ROSE, LAHTINEN and KANE, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: June 16, 2005
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)