KROHN v. SCHULTZ FORD LINCOLN INC (2025)

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Chanoch KROHN, appellant, v. SCHULTZ FORD LINCOLN, INC., et al., respondents.

2024-00189

Decided: September 24, 2025

MARK C. DILLON, J.P., FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY, LINDA CHRISTOPHER, BARRY E. WARHIT, JJ.

Certain & Zilberg, PLLC, New York, NY (Gary Certain of counsel), for appellant. Quintairos, Prieto, Wood & Boyer P.A., New York, NY (Kathleen M. Mulholland of counsel), for respondents.

DECISION & ORDER

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Thomas P. Zugibe, J.), dated November 14, 2023. The order denied the plaintiff's motion pursuant to CPLR 4404(a) to set aside so much of a jury verdict as awarded him the sum of $0 for future pain and suffering and future medical expenses as inadequate and contrary to the weight of the evidence and for a new trial on the issue of those damages.

ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The appeal must be dismissed as academic in light of our determination on a related appeal (see Krohn v. Schultz Ford Lincoln, Inc., ––– A.D.3d ––––, ––– N.Y.S.3d ––––, 2025 WL 2714307 [Appellate Division Docket No. 2022–07774; decided herewith]).

DILLON, J.P., CONNOLLY, CHRISTOPHER and WARHIT, JJ., concur.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law