Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Floyd CHARLES, Petitioner, v. Wayne BARKLEY, as Superintendent of Riverview Correctional Facility, et al., Respondents.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in St. Lawrence County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
Petitioner was found guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rules which prohibit inmates from harassing a facility employee, making false statements, being out of place and interfering with an employee. Among the evidence introduced at petitioner's disciplinary hearing was a misbehavior report authored by a female teacher indicating that she received a sexually suggestive card that matched petitioner's handwriting. According to a second misbehavior report, petitioner subsequently gained access to the teacher's classroom by lying to a correction officer. The reports, together with the card, petitioner's handwriting sample and the testimony of the teacher and the correction officer, provided substantial evidence of petitioner's guilt (see, Matter of Ellis v. Coombe, 253 A.D.2d 945, 679 N.Y.S.2d 714), despite the fact that a handwriting expert did not compare petitioner's handwriting samples with the card (see, Matter of Smith v. Coughlin, 198 A.D.2d 726, 604 N.Y.S.2d 630). We have examined petitioner's remaining contentions and reject them as lacking in merit.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: January 21, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)