Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Gilda AKLER, et al., Respondents, v. BOOTH MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER, et al., Defendants, Main Street Associates, P.C., Appellant.
In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for medical malpractice, etc., the defendant Main Street Ob/Gyn Associates, P.C., appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Milano, J.), dated January 29, 1998, which denied its motion pursuant to CPLR 3215(c) to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against it.
ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, the complaint is dismissed insofar as asserted against the defendant Main Street Ob/Gyn Associates, P.C., and the action against the remaining defendants is severed.
The defendant Main Street Ob/Gyn Associates, P.C., moved to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against it on the ground that the plaintiffs failed to enter a judgment against it upon its default in answering or appearing within one year of the default pursuant to CPLR 3215. To avoid dismissal of a complaint under such circumstances a plaintiff “must offer a reasonable excuse for the delay and demonstrate the merits of the complaint” (Richards v. Lewis, 243 A.D.2d 615, 616, 663 N.Y.S.2d 233; see, First Nationwide Bank v. Pretel, 240 A.D.2d 629, 659 N.Y.S.2d 291; Ingenito v. Grumman Corp., 192 A.D.2d 509, 596 N.Y.S.2d 83). In opposition to the appellant's motion, the plaintiffs failed to submit any evidence demonstrating the merits of their action (see, Mosberg v. Elahi, 80 N.Y.2d 941, 590 N.Y.S.2d 866, 605 N.E.2d 353; cf., Hoffmann v. Salitan, 203 A.D.2d 91, 92, 609 N.Y.S.2d 616).
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: January 25, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)