Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Elijah WEATHERSBY, Petitioner, v. Glenn S. GOORD, as Commissioner of the Department of Correctional Services, et al., Respondents.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Ulster County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
Petitioner, a prison inmate, was found guilty of violating prison disciplinary rules which prohibit inmates from being out of place and stealing or wasting State property. These charges were filed after the head cook of the correctional facility reported that petitioner, a porter, had taken a styrofoam tray belonging to the facility and was cooking food in the diet area of the kitchen without permission. Contrary to petitioner's contention, we find that the misbehavior report and the testimony of the head cook provide substantial evidence of petitioner's guilt (see, Matter of Garrastequi v. Goord, 252 A.D.2d 638, 675 N.Y.S.2d 196). Next, inasmuch as petitioner failed to object to the sufficiency of the misbehavior report at the hearing or on administrative appeal, such claims have not been preserved for our review (see, Matter of Plummer v. Barkley, 247 A.D.2d 714, 669 N.Y.S.2d 251). In any event, petitioner's contention that the misbehavior report failed to provide him with adequate notice of the disciplinary charges against him is rejected as meritless (see, Matter of Dumpson v. Goord, 253 A.D.2d 991, 679 N.Y.S.2d 718).
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: January 28, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)