Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Frank MADONNA, Petitioner, v. NEW YORK STATE POLICE AND FIREMEN RETIREMENT SYSTEM et al., Respondents.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent Comptroller which denied petitioner's request for accidental disability retirement benefits.
Petitioner, a police officer employed by the Port Authority, injured his left knee during the course of his employment when transporting a patient on a stretcher from the airport terminal to an ambulance. While lowering the stretcher over the curb where construction was underway due to airport renovations, petitioner misjudged the height of the curb and lost his balance after allegedly catching his foot in loose concrete. Respondent Comptroller denied petitioner's application for accidental disability retirement benefits on the ground that the incident did not constitute an “accident” within the meaning of the Retirement and Social Security Law. Although petitioner explained that he was watching the patient and looking straight ahead, he nevertheless failed to check the condition of the curb. Under these circumstances, we find no reason to disturb the determination that the incident was a result of petitioner's own misstep and not a result of an “accident” (see, Matter of Dooley v. McCall, 252 A.D.2d 724, 675 N.Y.S.2d 396; Matter of Deleo v. McCall, 251 A.D.2d 739, 673 N.Y.S.2d 790). Petitioner's remaining contentions, including his claim that he was denied a fair and impartial hearing because portions of respondents' memorandum of law were incorporated into the determination, have been reviewed and found to be unpersuasive.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: January 28, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)