Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Eric SAUNDERS, Petitioner, v. D. LA BOMBARD et al., Respondents.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Clinton County) to review a determination of respondents which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
Following a disciplinary hearing, petitioner, a prison inmate, was found guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rules prohibiting inmates from refusing a direct order and engaging in conduct involving the threat of violence. The misbehavior report relates that petitioner became loud and disruptive during a grievance hearing and refused repeated orders to stop talking and using abusive language. The detailed misbehavior report and corroborating testimony of a correction officer who witnessed petitioner's conduct, together with petitioner's admissions, provided substantial evidence supporting the determination of guilt (see, Matter of Foot v. Goord, 245 A.D.2d 903, 666 N.Y.S.2d 53). Contrary to petitioner's contention, we find no violation of any constitutional protected expression (see, Matter of Nicholas v. Herbert, 195 A.D.2d 1083, 600 N.Y.S.2d 545, appeal dismissed, lv. denied 82 N.Y.2d 821, 605 N.Y.S.2d 2, 625 N.E.2d 588), nor do we find that the penalty of 20 days' keeplock and loss of privilege constitutes cruel and unusual punishment. Having reviewed petitioner's remaining contentions, we find them to be without merit.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: January 14, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)