PARANSKY v. Cerumidy Realty, Inc., appellant. (2025)

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Zina PARANSKY, plaintiff-respondent, v. Olga GALKINA, etc., defendant-respondent, Cerumidy Realty, Inc., appellant.

2023-08653

Decided: August 27, 2025

FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY, J.P., CHERYL E. CHAMBERS, CARL J. LANDICINO, DONNA–MARIE E. GOLIA, JJ.

Kaufman Dolowich Voluck, LLP, White Plains, NY (Jack Babchik, Matthew C. Mann, and Belino Voshtina of counsel), for appellant. Law Office of Yuriy Prakhin, P.C. (Gil Zohar and Simon Q. Ramone, White Plains, NY, of counsel), for plaintiff-respondent. Abrams, Gorelick, Friedman & Jacobson, LLP (Atasia R. Richardson of counsel), for defendant-respondent.

DECISION & ORDER

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant Cerumidy Realty, Inc., appeals from stated portions of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Peter Sweeney, J.), dated August 2, 2023. The order, inter alia, denied that branch of that defendant's motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it.

ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.

The appeal must be dismissed as it has been rendered academic by our determination of a related appeal (see Paransky v. Galkina, ––– A.D.3d ––––, ––– N.Y.S.3d ––––, 2025 WL 2458544 [Appellate Division Docket No. 2023–08653; decided herewith]).

CONNOLLY, J.P., CHAMBERS, LANDICINO and GOLIA, JJ., concur.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network