IN RE: ANDREW R. (Anonymous). (2025)

DECISION & ORDER

In a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, the mother appeals from an order of disposition of the Family Court, Queens County (Joan L. Piccirillo, J.), dated June 30, 2023.  The order of disposition, insofar as appealed from, after a permanency hearing, in effect, continued the subject child's placement in the custody of the Commissioner of Social Services of the City of New York until the completion of the next permanency hearing or further order of the court.

ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.

The mother's appeal from so much of the order of disposition dated June 30, 2023, as, after a permanency hearing, in effect, continued the subject child's placement in the custody of the Commissioner of Social Services of the City of New York until completion of the next permanency hearing or further order of the court must be dismissed as academic, as that portion of the order has expired by its own terms and has been superseded by subsequent permanency orders from which the mother has not appealed (see Matter of Luna O. [Eneudis T.O.], 232 AD3d 799, 800;  Matter of Alisha S. [Carine S.-K.], 223 AD3d 827, 828;  Matter of Cecile D. [Kassia D.], 189 AD3d 1036, 1036–1037).

GENOVESI, J.P., DOWLING, WAN and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.