Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
SHARESTATES INVESTMENTS, LLC, etc., respondent, v. 2774 ATLANTIC AVE, LLC, et al., appellants, et al., defendants.
DECISION & ORDER
In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendants 2774 Atlantic Ave, LLC, Joel Rolnitzky, 2774 Atlantic Ave JBH, LLC, sued herein as 2774 Atlantic Ave J8H, LLC, Five Unit Homes, LLC, and Diros Marketing Corp. appeal from two orders of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Lawrence Knipel, J.), both dated October 12, 2022. The first order, insofar as appealed from, granted those branches of the plaintiff's motion which were for summary judgment on the complaint insofar as asserted against those defendants, to strike the answer of those defendants, and for an order of reference. The second order, insofar as appealed from, granted the same relief to the plaintiff, struck the answer of those defendants, and appointed a referee to compute the amount due on the note.
ORDERED that the appeals are dismissed, without costs or disbursements.
The appeals from the orders must be dismissed because the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of the order and judgment of foreclosure and sale in the action (see Matter of Aho, 39 N.Y.2d 241, 248, 383 N.Y.S.2d 285, 347 N.E.2d 647). Contrary to the plaintiff's contention, the issues raised on the appeals from the orders are brought up for review and are considered on the appeal from the order and judgment of foreclosure and sale (Sharestates Investments, LLC v. 2774 Atlantic Ave, LLC, ––– A.D.3d ––––, ––– N.Y.S.3d ––––, 2025 WL 2055337 [Appellate Division Docket Nos.2023–06189, 2023–06191; decided herewith]; see CPLR 5501[a][1]; Matter of Aho, 39 N.Y.2d at 248, 383 N.Y.S.2d 285, 347 N.E.2d 647; Nationstar Mortgage, LLC v. Medina, 230 A.D.3d 1330, 1330–1331, 217 N.Y.S.3d 243; cf. Bonczar v. American Multi–Cinema, Inc., 38 N.Y.3d 1023, 1025–1026, 168 N.Y.S.3d 711, 188 N.E.3d 1000).
GENOVESI, J.P., BRATHWAITE NELSON, VOUTSINAS and GOLIA, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 2022-10174, 2022-10176
Decided: July 23, 2025
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)