Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Holden GIOIA, appellant.
DECISION & ORDER
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Putnam County (Joseph J. Spofford, Jr., J.), rendered May 21, 2024, convicting him of grand larceny in the fourth degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant's contention, his waiver of the right to appeal was valid. The County Court properly advised the defendant prior to accepting the defendant's plea of guilty that the appeal waiver was a condition of the plea agreement offered by the People (see People v. Bradshaw, 18 N.Y.3d 257, 264, 938 N.Y.S.2d 254, 961 N.E.2d 645; People v. Felipe, 236 A.D.3d 920, 920–921, 228 N.Y.S.3d 328). Further, the court confirmed that the defendant had discussed the appeal waiver with his counsel. The record demonstrates that the defendant's waiver of his right to appeal was knowing, voluntary, and intelligent (see People v. Bradshaw, 18 N.Y.3d at 264, 938 N.Y.S.2d 254, 961 N.E.2d 645; People v. Felipe, 236 A.D.3d at 921, 228 N.Y.S.3d 328; People v. Jackson, 213 A.D.3d 697, 697, 180 N.Y.S.3d 915).
Since the defendant did not move to withdraw his plea or otherwise raise the issue before the County Court, his contention that his plea of guilty was not knowing, intelligent, and voluntary is unpreserved for appellate review (see People v. Mujica, 236 A.D.3d 677, 677, 227 N.Y.S.3d 729; People v. Pray, 183 A.D.3d 842, 842, 124 N.Y.S.3d 59). An exception to the preservation requirement does not apply here because the defendant's allocution did not cast significant doubt on his guilt, negate an essential element of the crime, or call into question the voluntariness of his plea (see People v. Delorbe, 35 N.Y.3d 112, 119, 125 N.Y.S.3d 327, 149 N.E.3d 20; People v. Mujica, 236 A.D.3d at 677, 227 N.Y.S.3d 729).
The defendant's valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes appellate review of his contention regarding the sentence (see People v. Lopez, 6 N.Y.3d 248, 255, 811 N.Y.S.2d 623, 844 N.E.2d 1145; People v. Foy, 238 A.D.3d 785, ––––, 231 N.Y.S.3d 226).
DUFFY, J.P., FORD, LANDICINO and VENTURA, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 2024-04610
Decided: July 02, 2025
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)