Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Lameek JONES, appellant.
DECISION & ORDER
Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Phyllis Chu, J.), imposed September 25, 2023, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.
ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed as academic.
Inasmuch as the defendant has completed the imposed sentence, the defendant's contention that the sentence was excessive has been rendered academic (see People v. Davis, 205 AD3d 731, 731–732; People v. Sofo, 202 AD3d 1004, 1005). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.
CONNOLLY, J.P., WOOTEN, WAN and GOLIA, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 2023-08967
Decided: June 25, 2025
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)