Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: JAMES D.H. (Anonymous), Appellant.
In a juvenile delinquency proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 3, the appeal is from an order of disposition of the Family Court, Nassau County (Koenig, J.), dated July 3, 1997, which, upon a fact-finding order of the same court, dated May 5, 1997, made upon the appellant's admission, finding that he committed an act which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crime of criminal trespass in the third degree, adjudged him to be a juvenile delinquent and placed him in the custody of the New York State Division for Youth for a period of 12 months.
ORDERED that the order of disposition is reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, the fact-finding order is vacated, and the proceeding is dismissed.
We conclude that reversal is required. The Family Court failed to ascertain whether the appellant was aware at the time of his admission of the “possible specific dispositional orders” that the court might issue in his case (Family Ct. Act § 321.3[1] ). Nor was he told the exact nature of the placement contemplated by the court or its possible duration (see, Matter of LeJuane S., 247 A.D.2d 481, 668 N.Y.S.2d 708; Matter of Melvin A., 216 A.D.2d 227, 628 N.Y.S.2d 698; Matter of Herbert RR., 214 A.D.2d 891, 625 N.Y.S.2d 362). In addition, the court failed to advise the appellant of his right to a fact-finding hearing (see, Matter of Delmar C., 207 A.D.2d 998, 617 N.Y.S.2d 611), and failed to obtain a proper allocution from the appellant's mother, who was present in the court, in accordance with Family Court Act § 321.3(1) (see, Matter of LeJuane S., supra; Matter of Shantique F., 223 A.D.2d 590, 636 N.Y.S.2d 407).
Inasmuch as the appellant has completed the period of placement, dismissal of the petition is warranted (see, Matter of Herbert RR., 214 A.D.2d 891, 625 N.Y.S.2d 362; Matter of Corey L., 140 A.D.2d 609, 528 N.Y.S.2d 1001).
In view of our determination, we need not reach the appellant's remaining contention.
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: October 05, 1998
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)