Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Roger STOKES, Petitioner, v. Glenn S. GOORD, as Commissioner of the Department of Correctional Services, et al., Respondents.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Chemung County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
Petitioner was found guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rules prohibiting inmates from assaulting staff, committing unhygienic acts and damaging the property of others after he threw feces and urine on a correction officer. The correction officer who authored the misbehavior report testified that she was standing next to petitioner's cell when she noticed that petitioner had covered a portion of his cell gate with a sheet. Moments later, she observed a corner of the sheet being pulled aside and feces and urine being thrown at her from the opening. This proof, coupled with the misbehavior report in which the correction officer identified petitioner as the inmate who assaulted her, provides substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt (see, Matter of Garcia v. Coughlin, 209 A.D.2d 801, 618 N.Y.S.2d 475). In addition, we reject petitioner's contention that the hearing was not timely concluded inasmuch as it was completed pursuant to a valid extension granted for the purpose of obtaining the testimony of petitioner's witnesses (see, Matter of Barreto v. Goord, 244 A.D.2d 610, 664 N.Y.S.2d 143). Petitioner's remaining contentions are either unpreserved for our review or lacking in merit.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: October 15, 1998
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)