Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: MIGUEL M.-R.B. (Anonymous). Graham-Windham, Inc., respondent; Monique B. (Anonymous), appellant.
In a proceeding pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b to terminate the mother's parental rights on the ground of mental illness and to free the subject child for adoption, the mother appeals from an order of the Family Court, Queens County (Richroath, J.), dated February 15, 2005, which denied her motion to vacate an order of fact-finding and disposition of the same court dated June 17, 2004, which, after a combined fact-finding and dispositional hearing, and upon her default in appearing at the hearing, inter alia, terminated her parental rights and transferred guardianship and custody of the subject child jointly to the petitioner Graham-Windham, Inc., and the Commissioner of Social Services of the City of New York for the purpose of adoption.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The mother's failure to appear at the combined fact-finding and dispositional hearing constituted a default in light of her counsel's election to stand mute (see Matter of Geraldine Rose W., 196 A.D.2d 313, 609 N.Y.S.2d 324; accord Matter of Vanessa M., 263 A.D.2d 542, 693 N.Y.S.2d 221). In order to be relieved of such a default, the mother was required to provide a reasonable excuse for her failure to appear, as well as a meritorious defense (see CPLR 5015[a][1]; Matter of Vanessa M., supra; Matter of Ann D., 239 A.D.2d 575, 658 N.Y.S.2d 983; Matter of Jazel Dominique D., 209 A.D.2d 410, 618 N.Y.S.2d 419).
Even assuming that the mother provided a reasonable excuse for her failure to appear, she failed to establish a meritorious defense to the relief sought in the petition (see Matter of Shirley C., 145 A.D.2d 631, 536 N.Y.S.2d 156). Accordingly, the court providently exercised its discretion in denying her motion to vacate her default (see Matter of Shirley C., supra ).
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: January 09, 2007
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)