Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Paul WHITE, Appellant, v. Anthony J. ANNUCCI, as Acting Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision, Respondent.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Jonathan Nichols, J.), entered May 16, 2023 in Albany County, which, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, granted respondent's motion to dismiss the petition.
Petitioner, an incarcerated individual, submitted two Freedom of Information Law (see Public Officers Law art 6 [hereinafter FOIL]) requests to the Department of Corrections and Community Supervision (hereinafter DOCCS). In December 2022, after both requests were denied, petitioner commenced this proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 seeking an order directing respondent to provide the documents specified in his FOIL requests. Supreme Court (Hartman, J.) signed an order to show cause, returnable on March 17, 2023, directing petitioner to serve copies of the signed order to show cause, petition, exhibits and any supporting affidavits on respondent and the Attorney General by ordinary first-class mail or personal service on or before February 17, 2023.
On the return date, in lieu of an answer, respondent moved to dismiss the petition pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(8), among other grounds, for failure to acquire personal jurisdiction, asserting that petitioner had not effectuated proper service. Respondent submitted an affidavit from an employee in counsel's office at DOCCS averring that a search of the files in counsel's office disclosed that no papers had been served on or received by DOCCS or respondent in this matter. In opposition to the motion, petitioner submitted a sworn affidavit of service indicating that, on January 26, 2023, he served respondent and the Attorney General with the requisite papers as directed by the signed order to show cause. Supreme Court (Nichols, J.) granted respondent's motion to dismiss, prompting this appeal by petitioner.
We find that the parties’ respective submissions raise issues of fact as to whether petitioner fulfilled the service requirements of the order to show cause. Accordingly, a traverse hearing is warranted in this case (see Matter of Elliott v. Butler, 8 N.Y.3d 972, 973, 836 N.Y.S.2d 544, 868 N.E.2d 226 [2007]; Matter of Harrell v. Fischer, 114 A.D.3d 1092, 1092–1093, 980 N.Y.S.2d 848 [3d Dept. 2014]; cf. Matter of Davila v. Rodriguez, 232 A.D.3d 1184, 1185, 220 N.Y.S.3d 456 [3d Dept. 2024]; People ex rel. Curran v. Keyser, 196 A.D.3d 980, 981, 148 N.Y.S.3d 403 [3d Dept. 2021], lv denied 37 N.Y.3d 907, 2021 WL 4098457 [2021]).
ORDERED that the judgment is reversed, on the law, without costs, motion denied, and matter remitted to the Supreme Court for further proceedings not inconsistent with this Court's decision.
Ceresia, J.
Aarons, J.P., Pritzker, Reynolds Fitzgerald and Powers, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: CV-23-1415
Decided: April 10, 2025
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)