Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
US BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, etc., respondent, v. Vincenza MORINGIELLO, appellant, et al., defendants.
DECISION & ORDER
In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendant Vincenza Moringiello appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Desmond A. Green, J.), dated May 26, 2023. The order, inter alia, denied those branches of that defendant's motion which were to vacate a judgment of foreclosure and sale and to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against her.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.
In or around January 2012, the plaintiff commenced this action to foreclose a mortgage against the defendant Vincenza Moringiello (hereinafter the defendant), among others. A judgment of foreclosure and sale was thereafter entered upon the defendant's default in opposing the plaintiff's motion for a judgment of foreclosure and sale.
In December 2019, the defendant moved, among other things, to vacate the judgment of foreclosure and sale and to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against her on the grounds, inter alia, that the plaintiff lacked standing and had committed a fraud upon the court. In an order dated May 26, 2023, the Supreme Court, among other things, denied those branches of the defendant's motion. The defendant appeals.
The Supreme Court properly denied those branches of the defendant's motion which were to vacate the judgment of foreclosure and sale and to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against her. The defendant failed to submit any evidence to establish that she was entitled to vacatur of the judgment of foreclosure and sale pursuant to CPLR 5015(a)(1) or (3) (see generally Chase Bank USA, N.A. v. Laroche, 208 A.D.3d 845, 847, 174 N.Y.S.3d 738; NYCTL 1998–2 Trust v. DR 226 Holdings, LLC, 192 A.D.3d 900, 145 N.Y.S.3d 74; Bank of N.Y. Mellon Trust Co., N.A. v. Talukder, 176 A.D.3d 772, 774, 111 N.Y.S.3d 94).
The defendant's remaining contention is without merit.
LASALLE, P.J., FORD, VOUTSINAS and GOLIA, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 2023-06386
Decided: April 02, 2025
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)