Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA., appellant, v. STATE BANK OF LONG ISLAND, et al., respondents.
In a turnover proceeding pursuant to CPLR 5225 and 5239, National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA., appeals, as limited by its brief, from stated portions of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Burke, J.), dated November 5, 1997, which, inter alia, found an assignment of certain lottery proceeds to be valid.
ORDERED that the order is modified by deleting the provision thereof denying that branch of the petition which was to direct the State Bank of Long Island to turn over money received after 1996 pursuant to a security agreement entered into with Dorit Avni dated July 9, 1993, and substituting therefor a provision granting that branch of the petition; as so modified, the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs to appellant, and the matter is remitted to Supreme Court, Nassau County, for the entry of an appropriate judgment.
Contrary to the appellant's contention, the assignment of certain lottery proceeds to the State Bank of Long Island was valid in that it was made pursuant to an “appropriate judicial order” (Tax Law § 1613; see also, Matter of Guri, 247 A.D.2d 388, 668 N.Y.S.2d 661). However, the Supreme Court erred in denying that branch of the appellant's petition which was to direct the State Bank of Long Island to turn over money received after 1996 pursuant to a security agreement the bank entered into with Dorit Avni dated July 9, 1993, inasmuch as that agreement was beyond the purview of a “so ordered” stipulation dated August 12, 1992.
The parties' remaining contentions are without merit.
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: July 12, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)