Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Dylan ORR, Petitioner, v. Donald SELSKY, as Director of Special Housing, Respondent.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
Petitioner was found guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rules that prohibit inmates from creating a disturbance which disrupts the order in any part of the facility and urging a demonstration detrimental to the order of the facility. The charges stemmed from petitioner's conduct of loudly stating outside the messhall that “we ought to shut the whole * * * jail down”, apparently in response to restrictions of taking food from the messhall. Notwithstanding petitioner's contention to the contrary, the detailed misbehavior report and testimony presented at the hearing provide substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt as to both charges (see, Matter of Mendez v. Great Meadow Correctional Facility, 246 A.D.2d 702, 667 N.Y.S.2d 518; Matter of Smith v. Senkowski, 245 A.D.2d 909, 910, 666 N.Y.S.2d 808, lv. denied 91 N.Y.2d 813, 674 N.Y.S.2d 279, 697 N.E.2d 180). The correction officer who authored the misbehavior report testified that petitioner's comment raised security concerns, especially in light of the fact that there had been rumors of an inmate strike. Contrary to petitioner's assertion, testimony at the hearing establishes that other inmates were in the vicinity. Any conflicting testimony presented at the hearing merely created a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve (see, id.). Petitioner's remaining contentions have been reviewed and found to be without merit.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: July 15, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)