Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Shane LEWIS, Appellant.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Ulster County (Donald Williams, J.), rendered July 6, 2018, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree.
In satisfaction of a 12–count superseding indictment, defendant pleaded guilty to criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree and agreed to waive his right to appeal. In accordance with the terms of the plea agreement, County Court sentenced defendant to a prison term of 10 years, to be followed by five years of postrelease supervision. Defendant appeals.
As the People concede, defendant's waiver of his right to appeal is invalid. Both County Court's colloquy and the written appeal waiver used overly-broad language suggesting a complete bar to appellate review (see People v. Ripley, 210 A.D.3d 1198, 1200, 177 N.Y.S.3d 802 [3d Dept. 2022], lv denied 39 N.Y.3d 1074, 183 N.Y.S.3d 809, 204 N.E.3d 445 [2023]; People v. Hawkins, 207 A.D.3d 814, 815, 170 N.Y.S.3d 732 [3d Dept. 2022]; People v. Goodwalt, 205 A.D.3d 1070, 1071, 167 N.Y.S.3d 250 [3d Dept. 2022], lv denied 38 N.Y.3d 1071, 171 N.Y.S.3d 452, 191 N.E.3d 404 [2022]). Accordingly, his challenge to the severity of the sentence imposed is not precluded (see People v. Lester, 232 A.D.3d 1056, 1057, 220 N.Y.S.3d 507 [3d Dept. 2024]; People v. Ripley, 210 A.D.3d at 1200, 177 N.Y.S.3d 802). Nevertheless, upon our review of the record and in consideration of the advantageous plea, we are not persuaded that the mitigating factors relied upon by defendant, including his substance abuse and mental and physical health issues, render the agreed-upon sentence unduly harsh or severe (see CPL 470.15[6][b]).
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
Garry, P.J., Egan Jr., Pritzker, Powers and Mackey, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 111636B
Decided: March 20, 2025
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)