IN RE: Germaine KIRTON (2025)

DECISION & ORDER

In a proceeding for the administration of the estate of Germaine Kirton, in which Brian Morris, as administrator of the estate, petitioned pursuant to SCPA 2103 for the turnover of certain property and funds on behalf of the estate, Brian Morris appeals from an order of the Surrogate's Court, Kings County (Bernard J. Graham, S.), dated March 17, 2023.  The order stayed the proceeding pending resolution of an action entitled Housing Urban Dev., LLC v. Morris, pending in the Supreme Court, Kings County, under Index No. 502449/14.

ORDERED that on the Court's own motion, the notice of appeal is deemed to be an application for leave to appeal, and leave to appeal is granted (see CPLR 5701[c]);  and it is further,

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The decedent, Germaine Kirton, died in 1990.  In 2014, Housing Urban Development, LLC (hereinafter HUD), commenced an action to quiet title (hereinafter the quiet title action) to certain real property located in Brooklyn (hereinafter the property), which was previously owned by the decedent and her husband, who predeceased her.  In early 2020, the Surrogate's Court appointed Brian Morris, the decedent's nephew, as the temporary administrator of her estate solely for the purpose of representing the interests of the estate in the quiet title action.  Later that year, the court issued letters of administration appointing Morris the administrator of the estate.  Morris, as the administrator of the estate, subsequently commenced this proceeding pursuant to SCPA 2103 against HUD, among others, for the turnover of the property and certain related funds to the estate.  By order dated March 17, 2023, the court stayed this proceeding pending resolution of the quiet title action.  Morris appeals, and we affirm.

Morris's arguments on appeal relate solely to alleged errors made by the Surrogate's Court in a related proceeding he commenced in August 2022 pursuant to SCPA 2113 to determine the rights of the decedent's distributees to the property.  Since the order appealed from did not determine the issues complained of, or any issues relating to the SCPA 2113 proceeding, Morris's contentions are not properly before this Court on appeal (see Garanin v. Hiatt, 219 A.D.3d 960, 961, 194 N.Y.S.3d 326;  Matter of Padin v. Padin, 103 A.D.3d 729, 730, 962 N.Y.S.2d 165;  Murray v. City of New York, 43 A.D.3d 429, 430, 841 N.Y.S.2d 341).

CHAMBERS, J.P., BRATHWAITE NELSON, VOUTSINAS and VENTURA, JJ., concur.