Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Jermaine COLEMAN, Petitioner, v. Glenn S. GOORD, as Commissioner of State Department of Correctional Services, Respondent.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.
Petitioner, a prison inmate, was found guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule prohibiting inmates from possessing weapons after a search of his cell revealed a blade-type weapon attached to a string located between petitioner's headboard and a wall divider. We reject petitioner's assertion that since the misbehavior report stated the wrong location of where the weapon was found, petitioner did not have adequate detail to provide him notice of the charge (see, Matter of Morris v. Selsky, 264 A.D.2d 925, 694 N.Y.S.2d 821). The record reveals that petitioner was aware that the wrong location was stated in the report and that the Hearing Officer called the correction officer who authored the report to testify to the mistake. In our view, the detailed misbehavior report and testimony by the correction officer who authored the report provide substantial evidence supporting the determination of petitioner's guilt (see, Matter of Gauthier v. Goord, 266 A.D.2d 855, 698 N.Y.S.2d 134; Matter of Vasquez v. Goord, 263 A.D.2d 819, 694 N.Y.S.2d 799). Although petitioner denies that the weapon was his and asserts that other inmates had access to the area, it was attached to a string easily accessible to petitioner. Under these circumstances, petitioner has failed to defeat the inference of possession (see, Matter of Vasquez v. Goord, supra ). Petitioner's contention that he had no knowledge of the weapon presented an issue of credibility for the Hearing Officer to resolve (see, Matter of Gauthier v. Goord, supra ).
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: February 24, 2000
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)