IN RE: Robert FRIEDMAN (2000)

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

IN RE: Robert FRIEDMAN, appellant, v. INCORPORATED VILLAGE OF NISSEQUOGUE, respondent.

Decided: March 06, 2000

DAVID S. RITTER, J.P., THOMAS R. SULLIVAN, SONDRA MILLER, DANIEL F. LUCIANO and HOWARD MILLER, JJ.

Kranz, Davis & Hersh, Hauppauge, N.Y. (Brian P. Schecther of counsel), for appellant. Plunkett & Jaffe, P.C., White Plains, N.Y. (Robert L. Byrne of counsel), for respondent.

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent, Incorporated Village of Nissequogue, which discontinued the petitioner's benefits pursuant to General Municipal Law § 207-c, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Werner, J.), dated December 15, 1998, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly dismissed the proceeding, as the petitioner failed to provide the respondent Village with releases for medical records which were “necessary for the [Village's] determination of the nature of the officer's medical problem and its relationship to his or her duties” (Matter of Schenectady Police Benevolent Assn. v. New York State Pub. Empl. Relations Bd., 85 N.Y.2d 480, 487, 626 N.Y.S.2d 715, 650 N.E.2d 373).

MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network