Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Elma J. BENNETT, petitioner, Robert Germano, et al., appellants, v. BOARD OF ELECTIONS OF the COUNTY OF DUTCHESS, et al., respondents, Cynthia L. Greer, respondent-respondent.
In a proceeding pursuant to Election Law article 16 to invalidate petitions designating Cynthia Greer as a candidate in a primary election to be held on September 14, 1999, for the nominations of the Republican Party and of the Independence Party, respectively, as their candidate for the public office of County Clerk of the County of Dutchess, the petitioners Robert Germano, Jr., and William Paroli, Jr., appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (LaCava, J.), dated August 13, 1999, as upon granting their application to invalidate the petition designating Cynthia Greer as a candidate of the Independence Party, denied their application to invalidate the petition designating her as a candidate of the Republican Party.
ORDERED that the judgment is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, without costs or disbursements, the application is granted in its entirety, and the Board of Elections of the County of Dutchess is directed to remove the name of Cynthia Greer from the appropriate ballot.
The method employed by the subscribing witnesses, including the candidate, of collecting the signatures for the designating petition on appeal permeated that petition with fraud, and warrants invalidation of that petition (see, Matter of Miller v. Gumbs, 207 A.D.2d 512, 615 N.Y.S.2d 932; see also, Matter of Haas v. Costigan, 14 A.D.2d 809, 221 N.Y.S.2d 138).
In light of our determination, we need not reach the remaining issues.
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: August 18, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)