Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Michelle CAMPBELL, respondent, v. Jeffrey JOHNSON, appellant.
In an action to recover on a promissory note, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Gowan, J.), entered May 6, 1998, which denied his motion for leave to vacate a judgment in favor of the plaintiff and against him in the principal sum of $20,000 entered upon his default in appearing in the action.
ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, for a hearing to determine whether personal jurisdiction over the defendant was obtained in the action, and for a new determination of the motion.
The Supreme Court erred in denying the defendant's motion for leave to vacate the default judgment entered against him on the ground that he submitted photocopied and not original affidavits in support of the motion (see, CPLR 2101[e]; Matter of Lamont D., 247 A.D.2d 615, 668 N.Y.S.2d 495; Matter of Samuel E., 240 A.D.2d 251, 658 N.Y.S.2d 306).
In his affidavit in support of the motion, the defendant stated that he was never served with the summons and complaint and that he first became aware of the judgment when his employer received an income execution. The affidavit of the process server indicates that the defendant was personally served at his place of business. In view of the conflicting affidavits, a hearing is necessary to determine whether the defendant was served with the summons and complaint.
If service was not effected, then the default judgment must be vacated unconditionally (see, Akhtar v. Cavalieri, 255 A.D.2d 275, 679 N.Y.S.2d 318; Taylor v. Jones, 172 A.D.2d 745, 569 N.Y.S.2d 131; Anello v. Barry, 149 A.D.2d 640, 540 N.Y.S.2d 460). Conversely, if the defendant was properly served, there is no excuse for his default and the motion should be denied (see, Taylor v. Jones, supra).
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: August 23, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)